Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Chinese Investment: Beyond the USA

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Twitter


GIF by Jia Guo. View pronunciation video from Jia.

Read this in your browser, see our newsletter archives, or view our Access archives for members.

Dear reader,

Two notes:

—Lucas Niewenhuis, Associate Editor

1. Beijing makes third threat to cut off rare earth elements to U.S.

In the center of page 3 of today’s People’s Daily, the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party, a commentary titled “The U.S. must not underestimate the ability of the Chinese side to hit back” made a very explicit and specific threat in its second-to-last paragraph (in Chinese, our translation):

Without a doubt, the U.S. wants to use the rare earths exported by China to beat down China’s development, and the Chinese people simply cannot accept this. Today’s America totally overestimates its own capability to control global supply chains, and is due to slap itself in the face when it sobers up from its happy, ignorant self-indulgence. The relevant Chinese government departments have said in many solemn statements that the U.S. and Chinese supply chains are highly integrated and complementary, and that with cooperation both benefit but with fighting all is hurt, so a trade war has no winner. May we offer a bit of advice that the U.S. not underestimate China’s capability to safeguard its own development rights and interests; don’t say we didn’t warn you!

  • The last phrase, “don’t say we didn’t warn you,” is 勿谓言之不预 wù wèi yán zhī bù yù in Chinese.
  • It is “generally only used by official Chinese media to warn rivals over major areas of disagreement, for example during a border dispute with India in 2017 and in 1978 before China invaded Vietnam,” according to Reuters.
  • But more recently, it has been used several times without severe action following, notes New America cybersecurity fellow Samm Sacks.
  • In this case, the phrase can be taken literally: The visit of President Xí Jìnpíng 习近平 to a rare earths processing facility in Jiangxi Province early last week was the first implicit warning. Then, a Q&A posted by the National Development and Reform Commission on May 28 used very similar language (in Chinese) to the People’s Daily commentary today. On the same day as the People’s Daily commentary, Xinhua wrote, “U.S. risks losing rare earth supply in trade war.”
  • What are rare earths? Reuters has a helpful explainer on what they are, and why they are so important to global technology supply chains.
  • How big a deal would China cutting off access be? There are different answers depending on where you look:
    • The impact might not be huge in the end because rare earth elements aren’t actually that rare, according to this article in The Verge.
    • But at least in the short term, the impact could be “devastating,” given the U.S.’s reliance on China for “about 80% of its supply,” Bloomberg says (porous paywall).
    • “Most of the rare earths mined outside China still end up there for processing — even the sole U.S. mine at Mountain Pass in California sends its material to the nation — as Beijing seeks to dominate manufacturing of higher-value products,” Bloomberg notes.
    • And finding new sources for rare earths can be a major environmental challenge: The SCMP reports on “not in my backyard” protests in Malaysia against rare earth refining by the Australian company Lynas Corporation.

China’s threat of supply chain attack should be seen as a direct response not so much to Trump’s tariffs, but more so to the U.S. Commerce Department’s announcement that it would ban exports of American technology components to Huawei. As we have written in this newsletter, and as Paul Triolo and Douglas Fuller wrote in a column for SupChina, this has massive implications that could overshadow any effects of tariffs. Here is the latest on the battle over Huawei, in brief:

  • Huawei “filed a motion…to accelerate its lawsuit against the White House, which it filed in March in a federal court in Texas. The request for summary judgment could expedite an outcome without the costs and time of a full trial, including avoiding handing over sensitive corporate information during the discovery process,” the New York Times reports (porous paywall).
  • As many as 1,200 U.S. suppliers will be affected by the Commerce Department blacklist if and when it goes into effect, Huawei executives told the Financial Times (paywall).
  • South Korea is stuck in the middle between the U.S. and China, as a government source there told Reuters: “Sorry, we are not the United States, and can’t just do the same as what the U.S. is doing to China.” Huawei by itself “bought $10.7 billion worth of South Korean products last year, accounting for about 17% of the country’s electronics parts exports to China,” Reuters says.
  • “American intelligence officials and telecommunications executives and experts have begun to concede that the United States will be operating in a world where Huawei and other Chinese telecom companies most likely control 40 to 60 percent of the networks over which businesses, diplomats, spies and citizens do business,” according to the New York Times (porous paywall).
  • “Huawei's yearslong rise is littered with accusations of theft and dubious ethics,” the Wall Street Journal reported in an extensive piece (paywall).

More to read and take note of related to the U.S.-China trade war and technology tensions:

Finally, on China’s economy amid the trade war, a few points:

  • Industrial profits in China are falling, with April’s official numbers showing a 3.7 percent drop from a year ago, Bloomberg reports (porous paywall). “State-owned enterprises’ profits fell 9.7% in the first four months of 2019, while private businesses’ profits increased 4.1% during the same period,” Bloomberg added.
  • “The economy is still decelerating. We are not likely to hit bottom until Q3,” economic consultancy Trivium wrote yesterday.
  • Factory activity in May is expected to shrink slightly, after expanding for two months, according to a Reuters poll.

2. Memories of June Fourth leading up to its 30th anniversary

Some good reporting, essays, and reflections to read about the legacy of the 1989 Tiananmen protests, and the bloody crackdown that ensued:

—Lucas Niewenhuis

Subscribe to SupChina Access

Get this full news brief in your inbox every weekday. Click here to subscribe to SupChina Access.

video on supchina

‘Tiger Mom’ Amy Chua on parenting, foreign affairs, and diplomacy

Yale law professor Amy Chua, best-selling author of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother and many other books, talks about her views on different parenting approaches in the West and the East, the current trade war associated with the idea of “political tribalism,” and why democracy can turn into a failure in countries ruled by ethnic or religious groups. This interview was held at the recent SupChina Women’s Conference in New York City.

featured on supchina

My science has no nationality: Chinese scientists in the age of Trump

For Chinese scientists who immigrated to the U.S., where do their hearts and bodies belong? In their home country, where an authoritarian government is increasing its hold on society, aided by technology for surveillance and censorship? Or in a country whose president actively rejects them, and where they are painted as spies? Yangyang Cheng, in this personal essay, explores the relationship between science and geopolitics, and its implications for our shared future.

Today’s news elsewhere on the web:


A total of 25 independent 5G patent-owned companies from different countries are participated in the global race for 5G SEP [Standard Essential Patents]. There are four Chinese companies (Huawei, ZTE, CATT and Oppo) accounting for 35.51%. In South Korea, three companies (Samsung, LG and KT) possess a total of 21.42%... Regarding the US, five companies (QUALCOMM, Intel, InterDigital, Apple and Optis) take up 14.29%. Japanese companies (Sharp, Fujitsu, Sony and NEC) hold 5.3% of the total 5G SEPs. European companies such as Nokia from Finland, Ericsson from Sweden, Innovative Technology from the UK and Sisvel from Italy, occupy 23.1% 5G SEPs in total…

However, it can not be directly concluded that China has a leadership position in 5G, since not all patents are of equal value, even if they are focused on the same technologies.





Get this full news brief in your inbox every weekday. Click here to subscribe to SupChina Access.

Didn't get enough?

Go to

This newsletter was sent at 7 p.m. from New York, NY on May 29, 2019

Subscribe to this newsletter | Forward to a friend | View in browser.

You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website,, or because you entered a SupChina-sponsored sweepstakes.

Unsubscribe <<Email Address>> from this list.

Our mailing address is:

81 Prospect St Fl 7027
Brooklyn, NY 11201-1473

Add us to your address book

Copyright (C) 2019 SupChina All rights reserved.

Forward this email to a friend
Update your profile